Abstract
The article deals with such element of the Prometheus myth as creation of humans from clay. This variation of the creation myth is present in such early sources as Hesiod and Aesop and in such classical ancient sources as Ovid and Properce; yet overall, it is rare. In late Antiquity, the plot becomes more popular (Pausanias, Hygin, Lucian). Sometimes, Hephaestus replaces Prometheus; sometimes the myth comes together with the Pandora myth, but the moment of animating a clay figure is usually vaguely described. The essay specifically focuses on Mythologies by Fulgentius (5–6 AD): both his narration and interpretation of the myth are rather unique. Fulgentius presents contamination of previous versions (such as stealing the fire from gods and giving it to humans; ascent to heaven; creation of humans from clay; Athena’s help; Pandora; punishment for stealing fire etc). Of particular interest is the stealing of the fire motif: in this version, Prometheus wants to animate humans with the help of fire instead of helping the humankind. The essay examines the etymology of Prometheus’s name and the allegory of the hawk in Fulgentius and pays special attention to the philosophical meaning of the fire that brings humans to life.
References
1 Zhurbina A.V. “Tolkovanie soderzhaniia [Eneidy] Vergiliia” Ful’gentsiia: pozdneantichnaia allegoricheskaia interpretatsiia [Expositio Vergilianae Continentiae by Fulgentius: allegorical interpretation in Late Antiquity]. Allegoriia v istorii zarubezhnoi literatury: ot pozdnei antichnosti do romantizma [Allegory in the history of foreign literature from late Antiquity to Romanticism]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2017, pp. 29–41. (In Russ.)
2 Zhurbina A.V. Pozdneantichnyi Vergilii: avtor ili avtoritet? Kazus Ful’gentsiia [Late ancient Vergil: author or authority? A case of Fulgentius]. Indoevropeiskoe iazykoznanie i klassicheskaia filologiia — XX (2) Materialy chtenii, posviashchennykh pamiati professora Iosifa Moiseevicha Tronskogo [Indoeuropean linguistics and classical philology — XX (2). Proceedings of the conference in honor of Prof. Iosif Tronsky]. Institut lingvisticheskikh issledovanii RAN. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2016, pp. 310–319. (In Russ.)
3 Lebedev A.V. (ed.) Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov [Fragments of early Greek philosophers]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989. Chast’ 1: Ot epicheskikh teokosmogonii do vozniknoveniia atomistiki [Part 1: From epic theocosmogony to atomistics]. 576 p. (In Russ.)
4 Losev A.F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo [The question of symbol and realistic art]. 2nd ed., with corr. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1995. 320 p.
5 Barchiesi A. (ed.) Ovidio. Metamorfosi. Volume I. Libri I–II. Mondadori, 2005. 504 p. (In Сorsican)
6 Carter Philips, Jr., F. Narrative Compression and the Myths of Prometheus in Hesiod. The Classical Journal, vol. 68, no 4 (Apr. — May, 1973), pp. 289–305. (In English)
7 Hays G. The Date and Identity of the Mythographer Fulgentius. Journal of Medieval Latin, 2003, no 13, pp. 163–252. (In En glish)
8 Kaiser S.I. (ed.) Die Fragmente des Aristoxenos aus Tarent. Hildesheim, Olms, 2010. 247 S. (In German)
9 Kerényi C. Prometheus: Archetypal Image of Human Existence. Archetypal images in Greek religion (vol. 1). Bollingen Series. Transl. by Ralph Manheim. Princeton University Press, 1997. 152 p. (In English)
10 Lieberg G. Sulla creazione dell’uomo in Ovidio. L’uomo immagine degli dei (Met. I 82–83). Bollettino di Studi Latini, 1999, nо 29, pp. 89–95. (In It alian)
11 Merkelbach R., West M.L. Fragmenta Hesiodea. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1967. 236 p. (In English)
12 Susanetti D. Favole antiche: Mito greco e tradizione letteraria europea. Rome, Carocci, 2005 (repr. 2017). P. 291. (In Italian)
13 Venuti M. Il prologus delle “Mythologiae” di Fulgenzio. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Naples, Iniziative editoriali, 2018. 320 p. (In Italian)
14 Wolff E., Dain P. (eds.). Fulgence, Mythologies. Lille, Presses Universitaires du
