Download:

PDF

For citation:

Bogdanova O.A. “Not a Golden Antique”: Experience of Negative Reception of the “Estate Culture” at the Turn of the 19th–20th Centuries. Studia Litterarum, 2020, vol. 5, no 3, pp. 252–269. (In Russ.)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2020-5-3-252-269

Author: O.A. Bogdanova
Information about the author:

Olga A. Bogdanova, DSc in Philology, Leading Research Fellow, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya 25 a, 121069 Moscow, Russia.

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7004-498X

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Received: January 15, 2020
Published: December 25, 2019
Issue: 2020 Vol. 5, №3
Department: Russian Literature
Pages: 252-269
DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2020-5-3-252-269

UDK: 821.161.1.0
BBK: 83.3(2Рос=Рус)53
Keywords: literature of the Silver age, “estate culture”, a new myth of the estate, negative connotations, socio-psychological criticism, aesthetic and civilizational criticism, N.S. Gumilev, A.N. Tolstoy, a story “Mishuka Nalymov (Zavolzhye)”.

Abstract

In contrast to passeistic and neo-mythological trends in the representation of the “estate culture” in the so-called Silver age, a number of works of that time follow another line — the one of aesthetic, civilizational, and socio-psychological critique. The latter tendency dates back to the serfdom period (A.I. Herzen, N.S. Leskov, L.N. Tolstoy, etc.). Pan-aesthetics, one of the main trends of Russian culture of the early 20th century, prompted the mentioned aesthetic critique. A number of authors questioned and rejected the idealization of the Golden age of “estate culture”, which in the Silver age claimed to be the “national ideal.” This is how the polemical image of “not a golden antique” appears in the works of I.F. Annensky, Andrey Bely, N.S. Gumilev, G.I. Chulkov, A.N. Tolstoy, etc. In addition, the structure of the “estate topos” includes civilizational critique of the “estate culture” as organic part of the Russian national-patriarchal world (A.I. Ertel, A.P. Chekhov, I.S. Shmelev, etc.). The article examined the mentioned negative connotations of the “estate topos” on the example of the story by Alexey N. Tolstoy “Mishuka Nalymov (Zavolzhye).”

References

1 Akhmatova A.A. Ty znaesh’, ia tomlius’ v nevole… [You know I am suffering in captivity…]. In: Ahmatova A.A. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6 t. [Collected works: in 6 vols.]. Moscow, Ellis Lak Publ., 1998, vol. 1, p. 143. (In Russ.)

2 Belinskii V.G. Nichto o nichem, ili Otchet g. izdateliu “Teleskopa” za poslednee polugodie (1835) russkoi literatury [Nothing about nothing, or Report to the publisher of the “Telescope” about Russian literature of the last half a year (1835)]. In: Belinskii V.G. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 13 t. [Complete works: in 13 vols.]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR Publ., 1953, vol. 2, pp. 7–50. (In Russ.)

3 Blok A.A. Rus’ [Rus]. In: Blok A.A. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 20 t. [Complete works: in 20 vols.]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1997, vol. 20, pp. 79–80. (In Russ.)

4 Bogomolov N.A. Okkul’tnye motivy v tvorchestve Gumileva [The occult motifs in the works of Gumilev]. In: N. Gumilev i russkii Parnas: Materialy nauch. konf., 17–19 sent. 1991 g. [N. Gumilev and the Russian Parnassus: Conference proceedings, September 17–19, 1991]. St. Petersburg, Muzei A. Ahmatovoi Publ., 1992, pp. 47–50. (In Russ.)

5 Bogdanova O.A. Usad’ba i dacha v russkoi literature XIX–XXI vv.: topika, dinamika, mifologiia [Estate and dacha in Russian literature of the 19th–21st centuries: topic, dynamics, mythology], ed. E.E. Dmitrieva. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2019. 288 p. (In Russ.)

6 Bogdanova O.A. Rasskaz A.N. Tolstogo “Utoli moia pechali” v kontekste russkoi kul’tury [The story of A.N. Tolstoy’s “Quench my sorrows” in the context of Russian culture]. In: Aleksei Tolstoi: dialogi so vremenem [Alexey Tolstoy: dialogues with time]. Moscow, Literaturnyi muzei Publ., 2017, pp. 9–19. (In Russ.)

7 Gor’kii M. Pis’mo slushateliam shkoly v Bolon’e ot 10 (23) – 11 (24) noiabria 1910 g. [Letter to students of the school in Bologna from 10 (23) – 11 (24) November 1910]. In: Gor’kii M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Pis’ma: v 24 t. [Complete works and letters: in 24 vols.]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2001, vol. 8, pp. 186–187. (In Russ.)

8 Gumilev N.S. Sochineniia: v 3 t. [Works: in 3 vols.]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1991. Vol. 1. 589 p. (In Russ.)

9 Dal’ V.I. Tolkovyi slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo iazyka: v 4 t. [Comprehensive dictionary of the living Russian language in 4 vols.]. Moscow, Russkii iazyk Publ., 1991. Vol. 4. 683 p. (In Russ.)

10 Dmitrieva E.E. Russkaia usad’ba: semantika, topos i khronos [Russian estate: semantics, topos and chronos]. In: Imagologiia i komparativistika, 2019, no 11, pp. 140–173. (In Russ.)

11 Dmitrieva E.E., Kuptsova O.N. Zhizn’ usadebnogo mifa: utrachennyi i obretennyi rai [Life of the estate myth: paradise lost and found], 2nd ed. Moscow, OGI Publ., 2008. 528 p. (In Russ.)

12 Dostoevskii F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 t. [Complete works: in 30 vols.] Leninrad, Nauka Publ., 1975. Vol. 13. 456 p. (In Russ.)

13 Kuznetsova E.V. Poetosfera [Poetic sphere]. Available at: http://litusadba.imli.ru/sites/ default/files/1_redkuznecova-poetosfera_opredelenie_0.pdf (Accessed 29 January 2020) (In Russ.)

14 Mints Z.G. Ob evoliutsii russkogo simvolizma: K postanovke voprosa. Tezisy [On the evolution of Russian symbolism: Thesis]. In: Mints Z.G. Blok i russkii simvolizm: Izbrannye trudy: v 3 kn. [Blok and Russian symbolism: Selected works in 3 books]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo–SPb Publ., 2004, book 3: Poetika russkogo simvolizma [The poetics of Russian symbolism], pp. 175–189. (In Russ.)

15 Nashchokina M.V. Russkaia usad’ba Serebrianogo veka [Russian estate in the Silver age]. Moscow, Ulei Publ., 2007. 432 p. (In Russ.)

16 Nitsshe F. Rozhdenie tragedii iz dukha muzyki [The birth of tragedy from the spirit of music]. In: Nitsshe F. Sochineniia: v 2 t. [Works: in 2 vols.], comp., ed., introd. and ref. by K.A. Svasyan. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1996. Vol. 1. 829 p. (In Russ.)

17 Sokolov M.N. Printsip raia: Glavy ob ikonologii sada, parka i prekrasnogo vida [The paradise principle: Chapters on the iconology of the garden, the park, and the beautiful view]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiia Publ., 2011. 703 p. (In Russ.)

18 Tolstoi A.N. Mishuka Nalymov (Zavolzh’e) [Mishuka Nalymov (Zavolzhye)]. In: Tolstoi A.N. Sobranie sochinenii: v 10 t. [Collected works: in 10 vols.]. Moscow, GIKhL Publ., 1958. Vol. 1. 628 p. (In Russ.)