Abstract
The article analyzes correspondence between Ivan the Terrible and Kurbsky as a conflict of interpretations. When founded on the common ground, the debates of contemporaries are only possible if the ideas are interpreted differently by the participants of the discussions. But the paradox of such a conflict is that it always implies some consensus. Indeed, without the common ground, any discussion is impossible. It can only be founded on the basis of a shared language, one developed within the same historical and cultural conditions. Despite coming from a commonly held conception of eschatology in Muscovy, Ivan the Terrible and Kurbsky held different views on The Last Judgment. And in spite of their mutual views on Christian martyrdom as being that which makes a Christian a Christian, they nevertheless accused one another of misinterpreting the act of martyrdom. Finally, we find it evident that both were striving to adapt models of religious philosophy to such earthly phenomena as government power, military service, and the adherence to the unbending principles of supremacy and servitude.
References
1 Erusalimskii K.Iu. “Gramotu pisal nevezhlivo”: Knizhnoe tvorchestvo i bezumie v Rossii XVI–XVII vv. [“Wrote Literature Impolitely”: Book Writing and Madness in Russia of the 16th–17th Centuries]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2017, no 4 (146), pp. 123–143. (In Russ.)
2 Erusalimskii K.Iu. Sbornik Kurbskogo [Collection of Kurbsky]. Moscow, Znak Publ., 2009. Vol. I. 881 p. (In Russ.)
3 Karavashkin A.V. Literaturnyi obychai Drevnei Rusi (XI–XVII vv.) [The Literary Custom of Ancient Russia (11th–17th Centuries)], 2nd ed. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ Publ., 2018. 720 р. (In Russ.)
4 Perepiska Ivana Groznogo s Andreem Kurbskim [Correspondence of Ivan the Terrible with Andrei Kurbsky], ed. by Ia.S. Lurie and Iu.D. Rykov. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1979. 432 p. (In Russ.)
5 Sergeev V.M. Struktura teksta i analiz argumentatsii pervogo poslaniia Kurbskogo [Text Structure and Analysis of the Argument of the First Message of Kurbsky]. Metodika po izucheniiu istochnikov po istorii russkoi obshchestvennoi mysli perioda feodalizma [Methods for Studying Sources on the History of Russian Social Thought of the Feudal Period]. Moscow, Institut istorii SSSR AN SSSR Publ., 1989, pp. 118–130. (In Russ.)
6 Skrynnikov R.G. Ivan Groznyi [Ivan the Terrible]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983. 250 p. (In Russ.)
7 Slovar’ russkogo iazyka XI–XVII vv. [Dictionary of the Russian Language, 11th–17th Centuries]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1992. Issue 18. 290 p. (In Russ.)
8 Panchenko A.M. O russkoi istorii i kul’ture [About Russian History and Culture]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka Publ., 2000. 464 р. (In Russ.)
9 Panchenko A.M., Uspenskii B.A. Ivan Groznyi i Petr Velikii: kontseptsii pervogo monarkha [Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great: the Concepts of the First Monarch]. Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoi literatury [Works of the Department of Old Russian Literature]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972, vol. 37, pp. 54–78. (In Russ.)
