Download PDF: http://studlit.ru/images/2019-4-2/Fedotova.pdf
Keywords: Gogotishvili, Vyach. Ivanov, Losev, S. Bulgakov, Florensky, Husserl, Heidegger, symbolism, name-worship, symbol, myth, antinomism, subject, predicate, reference, phenomenology, philosophy of language, theoretical poetics.
For citation:

Fedotova S.V. Linguophilosophical Novations of Russian Symbolism in the Interpretation of L.A. Gogotishvili (Vyach. Ivanov and A.F Losev). Studia Litterarum, 2019, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 252–273. (In Russ.)

DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2019-4-2-252-273

Author: Svetlana V. Fedotova
Information about the author:

Svetlana V. Fedotova, DSc in Philology, Leading Researcher, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya 25 a, Moscow 121069, Russia. ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9991-4966

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Received: January 24, 2019
Published: June 25, 2019
Issue: 2019 Vol. 4, №2
Department: Russian Literature
Pages: 252-273
DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2019-4-2-252-273
UDK: 821.161.1
BBK: 83.3(2Рос=Рус)6

Abstract

The article discusses the linguo-philosophical novations of Vyach. Ivanov and A.F. Losev in the interpretation of L.A. Gogotishvili, aimed to identify the underlying connections between the two theorists of symbol, myth, and language. It analyzes conceptual approach of the interpreter including the methods and techniques she used. The paper reveals likewise the logic and sequence of the ways these interpretations have been constructed, as well as their nature, originality, and scholarly importance. Gogotishvili’s research contribution to the study of Russian symbolism and onomatodoxy, with its doctrine of language, consists in her seminal understanding of their philosophy of language, as well as of the intellectual “techniques” used by Losev. This understanding helped Gogotishvili to develop her own theoretical approaches to the problem of reception of Ivanov’s symbolism and Losev’s work. In her study of symbolism, Gogotishvili moved from describing the religious status of language in onomatodoxy as well as , its communicative and predicative interpretations, to examining the predicative concept of symbol in Vyach. Ivanov, and then returning to Losev. As a result, here conclusions concerning general features of Ivanov’s and Losev’s novations have undergone some important changes.

References

1 Gogotishvili L.A. Kommunikativnaia versiia isikhazma [Сommunicative version of Hesychasm]. Losev A.F. Mif — Chislo — Sushchnost’ [Myth — Number — Essence]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1994, pp. 878–893. (In Russ.)

2 Gogotishvili L.A. Losev, isikhazm i platonizm [Losev, Hesychasm, and Platonism]. Losev A.F. Imia [Name]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ., 1997, pp. 551–579. (In Russ.)

3 Gogotishvili L.A. Lingvisticheskii aspekt trekh versii imiaslaviia (Losev, Bulgakov, Florenskii) [The linguistic aspect of the three versions of imyaslavia (Losev, Bulgakov, Florensky)]. Losev A.F. Imia [Name]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ., 1997, pp. 580–614. (In Russ.)

4 Gogotishvili L.A. Losevskaia kontseptsiia predikativnosti [Losev’s concept of predicativeness]. Losev A.F. Lichnost’ i Absoliut [Personality and Absolute]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1999, pp. 684–701. (In Russ.)

5 Gogotishvili L.A. Retseptsiia simvolizma v gumanitarnykh naukakh (lingvofilosofskii aspekt) [The reception of symbolism in the humanities (linguo-philosophical aspect)]. Literaturovedenie kak literaturа [Literary criticism as literature]. Moscow, Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur, Progress-traditsiia Publ., 2004, pp. 148–175. (In Russ.)

6 Gogotishvili L.A. Nepriamoe govorenie [Indirect speaking]. Moscow, Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur Publ., 2006. 720 p. (In Russ.) 

7 Gogotishvili L.A. Vklad postsimvolistov Loseva i Bakhtina v teoriiu postroeniia diskursa (printsipial’nye razlichiia na fone fundamental’nogo skhodstva) [The contribution of the postsymbolists Losev and Bakhtin to the theory of discourse construction (fundamental differences against the background of fundamental similarity)]. Filologiia: nauch. issled., 2014, no 4 (16), pp. 354–368. (In Russ.)

8 Gogotishvili L.A. Nominativnost’ i protsessual’nost’ v filosofii iazyka Pavla Florenskogo (imenovanie i diskurs v obratnoi perspektive) [Nominativity and procedurality in the philosophy of Pavel Florensky’s language (naming and discourse in the reverse perspective)]. Vox: http://vox-journal.org. Issue 21 (December 2016), pp. 1–43. (In Russ.)

9 Ivanov Viach.I. Sobranie sochinenii: v 4 t. [Collected works: in 4 vols.] Briussel’, Foyer oriental chrétien Publ., 1971–1987. (In Russ.)

10 Ioffe D. Russkaia religioznaia kritika iazyka i problema imiaslaviia (o. Pavel Florenskii, o. Sergii Bulgakov, A.F. Losev) [Russian religious criticism of the language and the problem of imiaslaviе (F. Pavel Florensky, F. Sergiy Bulgakov, A.F. Losev]. Kritika i semiotika, 2007, issue 11, pp. 109–172. (In Russ.)

11 Losev A.F. O tipakh grammaticheskogo predlozheniia v sviazi s istoriei myshleniia [On the types of grammatical sentences in connection with the history of thought]. Losev A.F. Znak. Simvol. Mif. Trudy po iazykoznaniiu [Sign. Symbol. Myth. Works on linguistics]. Moscow, Izd-vo MGU Publ., 1982, pp. 280–407. (In Russ.)

12 Losev A.F. []. Viacheslav Ivanov: pro et contra: v 2 t. [Vyacheslav Ivanov: pro et contra: in 2 vols.] St. Petersburg, RKhGA Publ., 2016, vol. 1, pp. 719–735. (In Russ.)

13 Takho-Godi A.A. Viacheslav Ivanov i nekotorye fakty iz biografii A.F. Loseva [Vyacheslav Ivanov and some facts from the biography of A.F. Losev]. Viacheslav Ivanov — tvorchestvo i sud’ba: k 135-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia [Vyacheslav Ivanov — work and life: to the 135th anniversary of his birth]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2002, pp. 272–282. (In Russ.)