Download PDF: http://studlit.ru/images/2019-4-2/Kudryavtseva.pdf
Keywords: German poetry, theoretical poetics, object-subject structure, style, direction, poetical persona, distancing, performance.
For citation:

Kudryavtseva T.V. On the Subject-Object Relations in Poetry: the Case of German Poetry from the Folklore Roots to the Postmodern Mainstream. Studia Litterarum, 2019, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 162–189. (In Russ.)
DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2019-4-2-162- 189

Author: Tamara V. Kudryavtseva
Information about the author:

Tamara V. Kudryavtseva, DSc in Philology, Leading Research Fellow, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya 25 a, 121069 Moscow, Russia. ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8279-8639
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Received: January 31, 2019
Published: June 25, 2019
Issue: 2019 Vol. 4, №2
Department: World Literature
Pages: 162-189
DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2019-4-2-162-189
UDK: 821.112.2
BBK: 83.3(4Гем)

Abstract

The article explores the dynamics of the subject-object relations in German poetry at different stages of its existence. The analysis focuses on the interrelation of the authorial voice and its lyrical doubles (from folklore to the present). The research aims to reveal the degree of authorial presence in the invented poetical persona on the example of poetical works written in different epochs, with a focus on love poetry. It also intends to explore the functions of various lyrical statements, to trace the peculiarities of poetical language in relation to the authorial intention and to a particular literary system the poem belongs to, and to identify some general trends, especially important for the poetry of the 1990s–2000s. The analysis reveals that the modern poet, as a rule, uses basic artistic patterns of the past but without copying them. Despite the fact that the main function of poetic statement is artistic self- expression the modern author gives a preference to the distinct asubject modality that reflects interpersonal relations in modern society. The study combines comparative and theoretical approaches. The results of the research may be employed in similar studies of other literary traditions.

References

1 Bakhtin M.M. Problemy tvorchestva Dostoyevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics]. Leningrad, Priboi Publ., 1929. 244 p. (In Russ.)

2 Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetic of verbal creation], comp. S.G. Bocharov, ref. by S.S. Averintsev i S.G. Bocharov. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1979. 423 p. (In Russ.)

3 Binshtok L.M. Liricheskoe stikhotvorenie. Analizy i razbory: ucheb. posobie [Lyric poem. Analyses and critiques: Stud. manual], ed. by Yu.L. Chumakov Leningrad, Gosuniversitet Publ., 1974. 153 p. (In Russ.)

4 Broitman S.N. Poetika knigi Borisa Pasternaka “Sestra moya — zhizn’” [Poetics of Boris Pasternak’s book My Sister — Life]. Moscow, Progress Traditsiia Publ., 2007. 608 p. (In Russ.)

5 Ginzburg L.Ia. O lirike [On poetry]. Moscow, Leningrad, Sovetskii pisatel’ Publ., 1964. 384 p. (In Russ.)

6 Demut F. Tsirroznaia strana [Cirrhosis country], trans. from German by T. Kudryavtseva. Moscow, Vakhazar Publ., 2007. 99 p. (In Russ.)

7 Karel’skii A.V. Mirovozzrencheskaia parodiia kak model’ khudozhestvennogo so- znaniia v nemetskoi literature XIX–XX vv. [Worldview parody as a model of artistic co-knowledge in the German literature of the 19 th –20 th centuries]. Metodologicheskie problemy istorii i teorii literatury [Methodological problems of history and theory of literature]. Vil’nius: Vil’niusskii un-t. Publ., 1978, pp. 298–303. (In Russ.)

8 Korman B.O. Izbrannye trudy po teorii i istorii literatury [Selected works on the theory and history of literature]. Izhevsk, Izd-vo Udm. un-ta Publ., 1992. 236 p. (In Russ.)

9 Kudryavtseva T.V. Noveishaia nemetskaia poeziia (1990-e — 2000-e gg.): osnovnye tendentsii i khudozhestvennye orientiry [Contemporary German poetry (1990s–2000s): main trends and artistic landmarks]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2008. 343 p. (In Russ.)

10 Lotman Iu.M. Ob iskusstve [On art]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo Publ., 1998. 704 p. (In Russ.)

11 Sardzhveladze N.I. Lichnost’ i ee vzaimodeistvie s sotsial’noi sredoi [Person in the interaction with social environment]. Tbilisi: Metsniereba Publ., 1989. 103 p. (In Russ.)

12 Sil’man T.I. Zametki o lirike [Notes on poetry]. Leningrad, Sovetskii pisatel’ Publ., 1977. 224 p. (In Russ.)

13 Timofeev L.I. Lirika [Lyrics]. Kratkaia literaturnaia entsiklopediia [Short literary encyclopedia]. Moscow, Sov. entsiklopediia Publ., 1967, vol. 4, p. 208. (In Russ.).

14 Todorov L. Liricheskii geroi [Lyrical hero]. Slovar’ literaturovedcheskikh terminov [Dictionary of literary terms]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1974, p. 177. (In Russ.)

15 Tomashevskii B.V. Prizrak v literaturovedenii [Ghost in literary studies]. Literaturnaia gazeta [Literary newspaper]. 1963, July 01. (In Russ.)  188

16 Tynianov Iu.N. Poetika. Istoriia literatury. Kino [Poetics. History of literature. Cinema]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. 576 p. (In Russ.)

17 Andreotti M. Die Struktur der modernen Literatur. Bern; Stuttgart; Wien, UTB, 2000. 488 S. (In German)

18 Biermann W. Alle Lieder. Köln, Kiepenheuer und Witsch, 1991. 455 S. (In German)

19 Borchers E. Gedichte. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1976. 115 S. (In German)

20 Brecht B. Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 8. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1967. 422 S. (In German)

21 Demuth V. Die Form des Gedichts. Neue Rundschau. 2002. N 3. S. 124–141. (In German)

22 Demuth V. Dieses ungeheure Textrisiko. Schreiben Leben / R. Draghinescu (Hg.). Ludwigsburg, POP Verlag, 2005. S. 67–81. (In German)

23 Der parodierte Goethe: Neue Texte zu alten Gedichten / A. Kutsch (Hg.). Weilerswist, Verlag Ralf Liebe, 1999. 103 S. (In German)

24 Drawert K. Lagebesprechung. Junge deutsche Lyrik. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001. (In German)

25 Elm Th. Einleitung. Lyrik der neunziger Jahre. Stuttgart, Reclam, 2000. S. 3–34. (In German)

26 Erk L. Böhme F.M. Deutscher Liederhort. Auswahl der vorzüglicheren Deutschen Volkslieder nach Wort und Weise aus der Vorzeit und Gegenwart gesammelt und erläutert. Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1893. Bd. 2. 800 S. (In German)

27 Freund W. Die literarische Parodie. Stuttgart, Metzler, 1981. 133 S. (In German) 28 Friedrich H. Die Struktur der modernen Lyrik. Von der Mitte des neunzehnten bis zur Mitte des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts. Hamburg, Rowohlt, 1956. 213 S. (In German)

29 German Poetry from the Beginnings to 1750 / G.C. Schoolfield (ed). New York, Continuum, 1992. 338 p. (In English)

30 Grass G. Phantasie als Existenznotwendigkeit. Grass G.: Werkausgabe: In 10 Bdn. Darmstadt; Neuwied, Insel, 1987. Bd. 10. S. 255–282. (In German)

31 Gräf D.M. Treibender Kopf: Gedichte. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1997. 79 S. 32 Grünbein D. Nach den Satiren. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1999. 228 S. (In German)

33 Hamburger K. Die Logik der Dichtung. Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 1957. 273 S. (In German)

34 Hamburger K. Wahrheit und ästhetische Wahrheit. Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 1979. 149 S. (In German)

35 Hensel K. Bahnhof verstehen: Gedichte 1995–2000. München, Luchterhand, 2001. 96 S. (In German)

36 Jakobson R. Shifters, Verbal Categories and the Russian Verb. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1957. 14 p. (In English)

37 Jespersen O. Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin. London, G. Allen & Unwin, 1922. 448 p. (In English) Мировая литература / Т.В. Кудрявцева

38 Kaspar H. Spinner: Zur Struktur des lyrischen Ich. Frankfurt a.M., Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 1975. 163 S. (In German)

39 Krechel U. Nach Mainz! Gedichte. Darmstadt, Luchterhand, 1977. 85 S. (In German)

40 Krechel U. Technik des Erwachens: Gedichte. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1992. 113 S. (In German)

41 Lafleur S. Lyrik. Hamburg; Bremen, Achilla-Presse, 2000. 14 S. (In German)

42 Lange B. Weinmond. Fulgura frango. Sonett-Salon. Available at: http://www.fulgura. de/sonett/karussel/160.htm. (Accessed 21 December 2018). (In German)

43 Maiwald P. Karla. Unsere Zeit. 14.04.2006. S. 13. (In German)

44 Meyer-Sickendiek B. Lyrisches Gespür: Vom geheimen Sensorium moderner Poesie. München, Wilhelm Fink, 2012. 571 S. (In German)

45 Rilke R.M. Sämtliche Werke. Bd. 1 / Hrsg. vom Rilke-Archiv in Verbindung mit R. Sieber-Rilke, besorgt von E. Zinn. Wiesbaden; Frankfurt a.M., Insel, 1955. 1635 S. (In German)

46 Runge D. Ikarus. Der neue Conrady: das große deutsche Gedichtbuch von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Erw. und aktualisierte Neuausg., 2. Aufl. Düsseldorf, Artemis & Winkler, 2000. S. 1109. (In German)

47 Susman M. Das Wesen der modernen deutschen Lyrik. Stuttgart, Strecker & Schröder, 1910. 130 S. (In German)

48 Trausch Ch. Meine Wege leben. Oschersleben: dr. ziethen verlag, 1994. 96 S. (In German)

49 Ullmann G. Der Tintenfisch springt über die Klassenbänke: Kindergedichte. Ahlhorn, Geest-Verlag, 2004. 92 S. (In German)

50 Užarević J. Liricheskii paradoks [Lyrical paradox]. Russian Literature, 1991, no 29, pp. 123–140. (In Russ.)

51 Verweyen Th., Wittung G. Die Parodie in der neueren deutschen Literatur. Eine systematische Einführung. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1979. 236 S. (In German)

52 Vogelweide W. von der. Under der linden. Der neue Conrady: das große deutsche Gedichtbuch von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Erw. und aktualisierte Neuausg., 2. Aufl. Düsseldorf, Artemis & Winkler, 2000. S. 109. (In German)

53 Walser M. Das geschundene Tier: neununddreißig Balladen; mit Zeichnungen von A. Walser. Reinbek bei Hamburg, Rowohlt, 2007. 88 S. (In German)

54 Wilpert G. von. Sachwörterbuch der Literatur. Stuttgart, Alfred Kröner Verlag, 2001. 925 S. (In German)