Download PDF: http://studlit.ru/images/2019-4-2/Shaytanov.pdf
Keywords: King Lear, folio, quarto, speech strategy, ‘sonnets of 1603’, ought to, mind, inwardness, reflection, L.E. Pinsky, S.S. Averintsev.
For citation:

Shaуtanov I.O. Speech Strategy in King Lear (on the Trends of Development in Cultural Reflection). Studia Litterarum, 2019, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 108–127. (In Russ.)

DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2019-4-2-108-127

Author: Igor O. Shaуtanov
Information about the author:

Igor O. Shaуtanov, DSc in Philology, Professor, Director of Research, Head of the Center of Contemporary Comparative Studies, Russian State University for the Humanities, Miusskaya Ploshad 6, 125993 Moscow, Russia; Leading Research Fellow, Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Prospect Vernadskogo, 82, bld. 1, 119571 Moscow, Russia.
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Received: January 20, 2019
Published: June 25, 2019
Issue: 2019 Vol. 4, №2
Department: World Literature
Pages: 108-127
DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2019-4-2-108-127
UDK: 821.111
BBK: 83.3(4Вел)5

Abstract

The final lines, especially the first two of the four rhymed lines, in King Lear have often evoked discussion and prompted the following questions: why are they attributed to different characters in the quarto and folio editions of the play and, no matter who utters them, how to interpret them? Sometimes, though not often, they were related to the initial situation of the tragedy and Cordelia’s refusal to address the words of love to her father. In the present article, Cordelia’s silence and the meaning of the final words are contextualized with the group of later sonnets (‘sonnets of 1603’) within the general movement of Shakespeare’s speech strategy towards ‘inwardness’ (Stephen Greenblatt). The key word in this group of sonnets — mind — is loaded with new significance and circulates from sonnet to sonnet in a regular use. The deepening reflection is an important manifestation of the epochmaking turn in cultural history, and Shakespeare was among the first to problematize it in his sonnets and tragedies.

References

1 Averintsev S.S. Drevnegrecheskaia poetika i mirovaia literatura [Classical Greek poetics and world literature]. Averintsev S.S. Poetika drevnegrecheskoi literatury [Poetics of classical Greek literature]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1981, pp. 3–14. (In Russ.)

2 Gal’frid Monmutskii. Istoriia brittov [The History of the kings of Britain], trasl. by A.S. Bobovicha. Gal’frid Monmutskii. Istoriia brittov. Zhizn’ Merlina [The History of the Kings of Britain. The Life of Merlin]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, pp. 5–137. (In Russ.)

3 Pinskii L. Tragicheskoe u Shekspira [The tragic in Shakespeare]. Pinskii L. Realizm epokhi Vozrozhdeniia [Renaissance realism]. Moscow, GIKhL Publ., 1961, pp. 250–297. (In Russ.)

4 Pinskii L. Shekspir. Osnovnye nachala dramaturgii [Shakespeare. Basic elements of dramaturgy]. Moscow, Khudozh. lit. Publ., 1971. 606 p. (In Russ.)

5 Shaitanov I. Pochemu medlit Gamlet? [Why Hamlet dallies?] Literatura v shkole, 2013, no 3, pp. 16–22. (In Russ.)

6 Shaitanov I. Igra ostromysliia v renessansnom sonete [Wit in Renaissance sonnet]. Voprosy literatury, 2017, no 6, pp. 222–236. (In Russ.)

7 Fineman J. Shakespeare’s Perjured Eye. The Invention of Poetic subjectivity in the Sonnets. Berkeley, University of Californa Press, 1986. 365 p. (In English)

8 Greenblatt S. Will in the World. How Shakespeare became Shakespeare. New York; London, Norton Company, 2004. 430 p. (In English)

9 Oppenheimer P. New Facts and a Theory. In: Oppenheimer P. The Birth of the Modern Mind: Self, Consciousness, and the Invention of the Sonnet. New York; Oxford, 1989, pp. 1–40. (In English)

10 Shakespeare W. A New Variorum Edition. The Sonnets, ed. Rollins H.E. Philadelphia and London, J.B. Lippincott & co., 1944. Vol. 1–2. (In English)

11 Shakespeare W. The history of King Lear, ed. by Stanley Wells. Oxford; New York, Oxford University Press, 2008. 321 p. (In English)

12 Shakespeare’s Sonnets, ed. by Katherine Duncan-Jones. London et als, The Arden Shakespeare, 2010. 490 p. (In English)

13 Shakespeare W. King Lear, ed., comm. by George Hunter, introd. by Kirnan Ryan. UK (London), Penguin Classics, 2015. 368 p. (In English)