Abstract
This study aims to trace and demonstrate the construction of Pushkin cult in two essays by Andrey Bitov, “The Last Text” and “The Sword of the Sensitive Nobleman.” It examines how cultic mechanisms including specific rhetoric formulas operate in both texts. Bitov’s cultic approach, however, does not imply dogmatic attitude to Pushkin nor requires a prescriptive attitude to his heritage. Quite on the contrary: Bitov’s texts are as always open, dialogical, and openly address themselves to the reader. I am interested primarily in the points of convergence between Bitov’s scholarly approach to Pushkin’s work, e.g. his study of the Pushkin’s reception history, on the one hand, and his literary position, on the other; yet at the same time, I find most interesting the way he expresses his concept. He writes an essay where he suggests something rather than states it, prompts, hints, offers one interpretation the way that does not exclude an entirely different one. Thus, this article examines how Bitov’s text is constructed and how it functions.
References
1 Bitov А.G. Predpolozhenie zhit’. 1836 [A proposal to live. 1836], ed. Bitov A.G. Moscow, Izd-vo Nezavisimaia gazeta Publ., 1999. 920 p. (In Russ.)
2 Bitov A.G. Molenie o chashe (Poslednii Pushkin) [A prayer for the hour (The last Pushkin)]. Moscow, Izd-vo Fortuna EL Publ., 2007. 176 p. (In Russ.)
3 Bitov A.G. Pushkinskii tom [Pushkin volume]. Moscow, Izd-vo AST Publ., 2014. 460 p. (In Russ.)
4 Bitov A.G. Esse o Pushkine [Essay about Pushkin]. Novaia Gazeta, 2014, September 29. Available at: http://www.novayagazeta.ru/arts/65485.html (Accessed 15 December 2017). (In Russ.)
5 Dolinin A.A. Kak ponimat’ mistifikatsiiu Pushkina “Poslednii iz svoistvennikov Ioanny d’Ark” [How to understand Pushkin’s hoax “The Last of Jean d’Arс’s Connections]. I vremia i mesto: Istoriko-filologicheskii sbornik k shestidesiatiletiiu Aleksandra L’vovicha Ospovata [Time and space: historico-philological collection in memory of the 60 year anniversary of Alexander L’vovitch Ospovat]. Moscow, Novoie izd-vo Publ., 2008, pp. 198–217. (In Russ.)
6 Kalavski Zh. Ravnodushnaia priroda kak pushkinskii motiv v romane Sergeia Dovlatova “Zapovednik” [Indifferent nature as a Pushkin motif in Sergei Dovlatov’s Sanctuary]. Studia Slavica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 2011, no 56, pp. 391–407. (In Russ.)
7 Kul’t kak fenomen literaturnogo protsessa: avtor, tekst, chitatel’ [Literary Cult as a Phenomenon of Contemporary Literary Process: Author, Text, Reader], ed. Nad”iarnykh M.F., Urakova A.P. Moscow, IMLI RAN Publ., 2011. 480 p. (In Russ.)
8 Pushkin A.S. Poslednii iz svoistvennikov Ioanny d’Ark [The Last of Jean d’Ark’s Connections]. Pushkin A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 16 t. [Complete Works: in 16 vols.]. Мoscow; Leningrad, Izd-vo АN SSSR Publ., 1937–1959. Vol. 12: Кritika. Avtobiografiia [Criticism. Autobiography], 1949, pp. 153–155. (In Russ.)
9 Tolstoy L.N. Zhivoi trup [Living corpse]. Tolstoy L. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 90 t. [Complete Works: in 90 vols.]. Moscow, Gos. Izd-vo Hudozh. Lit. Publ., 1952, vol. 34, pp. 5–100. (In Russ.)
10 Shevelev I. Andrei Bitov o krizisah Pushkina, teorii otnositel’nosti i vsesoiuznoi perepisi tsarei [Andrey Bitov on Pushkin’s crises, the theory of relativity and the all- Union census of the tzars]. Rossiiskaia gazeta, 2005, April 5. Available at: https://rg.ru/2005/04/05/a59424.html (Accessed 15 December 2016). (In Russ.)
11 Khodasevich V.F. O chtenii Pushkina (K 125-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia) [On the reading of Pushkin: to the 125 year anniversary]. Khodasevich V. F. Sobranie sochinenii: v 4 t. [Works: in 4 vol.]. Мoscow, Soglasie Publ., 1996. Vol. 2. Zapisnaia knizhka. Stat’i o russkoi poezii. Literaturnaia kritika 1922-1939 [A notebook. Essay on Russian literature. Literary criticism 1922–1939]. 572 p. Available at: http://az.lib.ru/h/hodasewich_w_f/text_0750.shtml (Accessed 15 December 2016). (In Russ.)
12 Cultic Revelations: Studies in Modern Historical Cult Personalities and Phenomena. Spectrum Hungarologicum, Vol. 4, ed. A. Halmesvirta. Jyväskylä; Pécs, University of Jyväskylä, Faculty of Humanities, Hungarian Studies Publ., 2010. 196 p. (In English)
13 Dávidházi P. The Romantic Cult of Shakespeare: Literary Reception in Anthropological Perspective. Basingstoke, London, New York, St. Martin’s Press, Macmillan, 1998. 240 p. (Romanticism in Perspective: Texts, Cultures, Histories). (In English)
14 Literature and its Cults. An Anthropological Approach, eds. P. Dávidházi, J. Karafiáth. Budapest, Argumentum Publ., 1994. 270 p. (In English)
15 Kalavszky Zs. “Downkóros. Hatujjú szeráf. Pofon a közízlésnek”: Puskin, az isteni és az idióta Tatyjana Tolsztaja Ksssz! című regényében [“Complete moron. Six-fingured seraph. A slap in the face of public face!” Pushkin idiotic and divine in Tatyana Tolstay’s novel Kys’]. Puskintól Tolsztojig és tovább...: Tanulmányok az orosz irodalom és költészettan köréből [От Пушкина до Толстого и дальше…Собрание трудов по русской литературе и поэзии], ed. Á. Kovács. Budapest, Argumentum Kiadó Publ.; ELTE Orosz Irodalom és Irodalomkutatás Doktori Program [Eötvös Loránd University
Faculty of Humanities PhD Programme “Russian Literature and Literary Studies”], 2006, pp. 161–173. (In Hungarian)
16 Kalavszky Zs. “Puskin — a kenyerünk, a vérünk, a levegőnk”: Mihail Epstejn Új szektásság című könyvéhez [Pushkin is our bread, our blood, our air: About the Book New Sectarianism by Mikhail Epstein. The Varieties of Religious-Philosophical Consciousness in Russia]. 2000, 2008, April, pp. 50–57. (In Hungarian)
17 Kalavszky Zs. Ki a múzeumból! El a romoktól! Egy Puskin-”esszéregény” kezdetei Andrej Bitov A Puskin Ház című regényében [Get out of the museum! Away from the ruins!
The beginning of the essay-novel in Bitov’s novel Pushkin House]. Ex Symposion, no 66, 2008, pp. 27–34. (In Hungarian)
18 Kalavszky Zs. Puskin, Apuskin, Nyepuskin: Andrej Bitov: Puskin fotója (1799–2099) [Pushkin, Apushkin, Nepushkin. Andrei Bitov’s short story “Pushkin’s Photograph (1799–2099)”]. In Honorem Hetesi István 70. [In honorem Istvan Hetesi 70], ed. G. Kocsis. Budapest, ELTE BTK “Orosz Irodalom és Irodalomkutatás” Doktori Program [Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Humanities PhD Program “Russian Literature and Literary Studies”], 2012, pp. 127–139. (In Hungarian)
19 Kalavszky Zs. Recenzió a Kul’t kak fenomen literaturnogo protsessa: avtor, tekst, chitatel’ című könyvről, eds. M.F. Nad”iarnykh, A.P. Urakova. Moscow, IMLI RAN Publ., 2011. [Review of Literary Cult as a Phenomenon of Contemporary Literary Process: Author, Text, Reader Eds. M.F. Nadyarnyh, A.P. Urakova. Moscow, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature Press, 2011.] RECITI, 2014, December 25. Available at: http://reciti.hu/2014/2389 (Accessed 15 December 2016). (In Hungarian, with abstracts in English and in Russian)
